Cell Phone Neutralizer
|
|
| The Neutralizer™ |
|
|
The Neutralizer reduces the effects of harmful radiation from EMF.
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
Man-made EMFs have a chaotic energy and different frequency than natural EMFs and can disrupt or distort organic energy patterns. It is precisely this ability to distort human energy patterns that causes artificial EMFs to be hazardous. Human-made EMFs may cause cancer and present other grave dangers to human health.
Aulterra is a homeopathically activated combination of natural paramagnetic and diamagnetic elements which neutralize the effect of man-made EMF exposure on human DNA. Noted DNA researcher Dr. Maria Syldona recently completed a study in which she concluded:
' . . . the natural coherent energy emanating from Aulterra neutralized the incoherent energy from the man-made EMF, rendering it harmless to human DNA. 5
The Aulterra Neutralizer™ Will Not Interfere with the Functioning of Your Cell Phone
Unlike other EMF blocking devices, the Aulterra Neutralizer will not affect cellular phone reception or transmission. Your phone will still be the convenient communications tool you wanted it to be--it will just no longer be dangerous to your DNA and your health.
The Aulterra Neutralizer™ Will Work on Any Cellular Phone
The Aulterra Neutralizer™ is effective against harmful EMF/RF radiation with any style of cellular phone.
The Aulterra Neutralizer™ Works on Other EMF Radiating Devices Too!
Cellular phones are not the only harmful EMF radiating devices in our homes or offices. If you have any of these electronic devices, you need the protection of the Aulterra Neutralizer™:
-
Computer terminal
-
Microwave
-
Cordless telephone
-
Television
-
Video Game Equipment
The Aulterra Neutralizer™ is Easy To Use. Just Stick it on and You're Protected.
There's no complicated installation procedure with the Aulterra Neutralizer™. The adhesive backed disc will stick to almost any surface and provide you with constant protection for as long as it remains on the device. Just apply it to any relatively flat, smooth surface on your cellular phone, or other device and you can feel confident again.
The Aulterra Neutralizer™
The reasonably priced Neutralizer™ will be a small price to pay for the safety and peace of mind that comes with knowing you and your loved ones are safe from the harmful effects of EMF exposure.
Studies Prove Cell Phone Radiation Causes Damage to DNA
The latest studies confirm what the cellular phone corporations do not want you to know. Even casual use of a cellular phone can damage the DNA in sensitive areas of your brain. A landmark study conducted by Dr. Henry Lai of the University of Washington showed that even at low levels, exposure to electromagnetic fields and radio frequencies (EMFs/RFs) caused DNA damage to brain cells of rats resulting in loss of short and long-term memory and slower learning. Further he noted:
DNA damages in cells could have an important implication on health because they are cumulative. 1
That's bad enough, but the news gets worse. A study done at Penn State University concluded that EMF exposure produced no effect for the "first few minutes, . . . then a cascade of microbial destruction occurs. 2
The levels at which damage occurs have been shown to be as low as .024-.0024 W/kg--much lower than any cellular phone! 3
Even using an earpiece will not keep you out of danger from EMF exposure. Earpieces act almost like 'conduits' to funnel as much as three times the harmful radiation to your brain. 4 1) Lai, Henry, "Neurological Effects of Radio frequency Electromagnetic Radiation," a paper presented at the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium, Oct. 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna, Austria.
2) Penn State University, "DNA and the Microwafe Effect," January 20, 2001.
3) Phillips, J.L; Ivaschuk, O.; Ishida-Jones, T.; Jones, R.A.; Campbell-Beecher, M.; Haggren, W., DNA Damage in Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro. Biolectrochem. Bioenerg. 45:103-110; 1998.
4) London Times, "Hands Free Phone May Triple Risks," April 4, 2000
5) Dr. Glen Rien in house study 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Phone Radiation to Unleash Epidemic of Brain Tumors by David Gutierrez
(NaturalNews) A new review of more than 100 studies on the safety of mobile phones has concluded that cellular devices are poised to cause an epidemic of brain tumors that will kill more people than smoking or asbestos.
The review was conducted by neurosurgeon Vini Khurana, who has received more than 14 awards in the past 16 years, who made headlines worldwide with his warnings. He called upon the industry to immediately work to reduce people's exposure to the radiation from mobile phones.
According to Khurana, research demonstrates that long-term use of mobile handsets, more than 10 years, can double the risk of contracting brain cancer. While a number of studies have concluded that there is no such risk, Khurana said that most of those studies only examined short-term use. But because a brain tumor can take 10 years to develop, studies without a long follow-up period are largely meaningless.
"There is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumors," Khurana said, a link that will be "definitively proven" within 10 years.
Khurana urged people to minimize their use of mobile phones, particularly handsets. He also urged the industry to act immediately to reduce exposure to radiation from the devices.
While mobile phones may save lives in certain emergency situations, Khurana said, brain cancer is "a life-ending diagnosis."
"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," Khurana said. While one billion people worldwide smoke tobacco, three times as many now use mobile phones.
Smoking is responsible for five million deaths each year.
While the United Kingdom's Independent newspaper described Khurana's study as "the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks" of mobile phones, his warning is not the first. A Swedish study in 2006 concluded that people who used mobile phones for an hour or more each day had a 240 percent higher brain tumor risk than non-users. Tumors were significantly more likely to develop on the side of the head where the phone was most often used.
Inspired in part by such studies, France has warned against mobile phone use (especially in children), Germany urges people to minimize their use of mobile handsets, and the European Environment Agency has called for minimizing exposure to cellular radiation.
The mechanisms by which mobile phones increase cancer risk are not well understood, but several possibilities are suspected. Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is known to directly heat up the head and brain, and can also cause thermoelectric effects on cells and DNA. According to Khurana, even bluetooth devices and unshielded headsets merely turn the head into an antenna that bombards itself with radiation. Children, with thinner skulls than adults, are particularly at risk.
"EMR rays in general cause irritation, concentration lapses and in many cases even proliferation of cells which cause cancer," said Dr Rajeev Ranjan, a New Delhi neurologist. Radiation can also interfere with the functioning of medical devices like pacemakers.
EMR also "affect[s] the DNA and cause[s] problems in cell recovery and cell growth," said New Delhi neurologist Anshu Rohatgi.
Khurana warned that if immediate measures are not taken, mobile phones will soon be responsible for a massive public health crisis.
"We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation," he said.
Because mobile phone use began in the mid-1980s and it can take up to 20 years to diagnose a malignant solid brain tumor, he said, "In the years 2008-2012, we will have reached the appropriate length of follow-up time to begin to definitively observe the impact of this global technology on brain tumor incidence rates."
"Malignant brain tumor incidence and its associated death rate will be observed globally to rise within a decade from now," Khurana said, "by which time it may be far too late to meaningfully intervene."
Sources for this story include: www.independent.co.uk, www.dnaindia.com, www.stuff.co.nz.
|
|
|
